I’ve
always believed that animals were able to feel just as much, maybe a little
more or less, as humans do. In my mind, it never occurred to me that people
would ever think that animals didn't have the ability to feel pain. Emotions, I
understand, could be questionable because people choose how they want to see
and interpret things. For me, a dog or cat whose face that I look into is
easier for me to believe can feel emotions than an ant or a cockroach that I
will ultimately step on and crush until they die…. in a nice way. But if you
were to ask an insect enthusiast how they felt on the matter, they would most
likely disagree with me. In one of the responses to Rifkin, Bob Stevens, who is
against Rifkin’s claims, says that Rifkin is implying that animal lives are
more important than human ones. I didn’t feel that that was necessary because I
feel that taking Rifkin’s claims and twisting it in a way that could make a
reader hate animals in uncalled for. All in all I do believe that animals can
feel pain and some can feel emotions so they should be treated like they should.
I definitely agree with your claim. I could never treat something I think of as a pet like a cat or dog the same way I could treat an insect. If someone were to argue my point like Bob Stevens argued Rifkin, I probably wouldn't have a very logical response to give. I have much more empathy towards animals I view as pets. My emotional attachments to pets are the reason I think they should have more rights.
ReplyDelete