All
this talk about fish and whether they have consciousness or not has befuddled
me and motivated me to do research on the matter. If animal rights activists are
to judge and calculate the consciousness of nonhuman animals they should first
think of how humans are different from the rest of the organisms out there. We are
obviously more superior and intellectual, and we are the only organism to have
evolved and adapted in such a short time, and to have made a great leap in intellect
and consciousness. This is what I believe separates us from other organisms;
you don’t see fish evolving or adapting to the changing world, or dogs, or even
primates.
A
“mirror test” brought up by Gordon G. Gallup, a psychologist, is able to expand
on the matter. By revealing a mirror to chimpanzees that have never seen one
before they expressed the ability of self recongnition, as does a human baby
when exposed to a mirror. This test is just one of many ways to measure the cognitive
levels of animals in relation to humans.
The
Greek philosopher, Aristotle, describes humans as having “rational souls” and
other animals as being a suited with their instincts in reproduction and
survival. This argument about mans place in the world is still present in our
society and what is the true meaning of reasoning and if other animals display
it. The main
question is
how can how can one know that others have mental states that are
anything like one's own? Until there is evidence of consciousness of
nonhuman animals then there deserves to be rights and the question of ethics
and morals, but until that happens the world should continue what it’s doing
because it is neither bad nor good, it’s just natures way.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.